Negating Antecedent And Consequent

A formal fallacy where in the valid transpositional form of an argument, we fail to switch the antecedent and consequent. The valid form of this argument is as follows: If P then Q.

Examples:

  • _If Barry Manilow sings love songs, then he is gay.

Therefore, if Barry Manilow does not sing love songs, then he is not gay._

Synonyms: improper transposition