In the Places They Left

Core idea

The topic turns the camera around. After 600 pages following migrants out of the South, Wilkerson asks what happened to the places they left. Chickasaw County, Mississippi, and Lake County, Florida, and Ouachita Parish, Louisiana, were not frozen in 1937 or 1945 or 1953; they kept moving, sometimes faster than the receiving cities did, because the migration itself had forced the change. Mechanical harvesters replaced the sharecroppers who had walked north. The Brown ruling sat unenforced for fifteen years. Willis V. McCall's colored only waiting-room sign came down in 1971 only under federal-court threat — and McCall himself was finally voted out the following year, by people whose vote the migration's pressure had helped secure. The places the migrants left were transformed by the very absence the migrants had created.

Wilkerson's argument: The South integrated not despite the out-migration but partly because of it — and the schools, sheriffs, and lunch counters the migrants had once not been able to challenge were defeated by the long pressure of the people who had left.

Why it matters

Mechanization filled the labor hole

By 1970, the cotton economy that had bound Ida Mae and George and Robert's parents was running on big combines and mechanical harvesters. Willie Jim was still running a thousand-acre plantation in Chickasaw County, but his hoe hands had been replaced by machines. The people who had not gone north now worked in textile mills, poly-foam plants, sewer-pipe factories, and trailer shops. The Mississippi countryside had not stopped working — it had stopped needing sharecroppers. The migrants who had been told their labor was indispensable had been replaced by capital equipment within a generation.

Brown v. Board sat unenforced for fifteen years

Brown was decided in 1954. The follow-up 1955 ruling told school boards to integrate "with all deliberate speed" — language much of the South translated as whenever we get around to it. Prince Edward County, Virginia, closed its entire school system from 1959 to 1964 rather than integrate; the county channeled public money to private white academies while Black students went to live with relatives, studied in church basements, or simply did without school. Chickasaw County did not integrate until the 1970–71 school year, sixteen years after Brown, and only under the 1969 Alexander v. Holmes court order. A 1968 survey found 83% of white southerners preferred a school system with no integration. By 1971, a quarter of white Mississippi students were in newly-founded private "segregation academies" — 158 such schools opened between Brown's enforcement and the 1971 school year. Mothers went back to work to pay the tuition; one school superintendent committed suicide in the middle of the turmoil.

Lake County and the slow fall of Willis V. McCall

Lake County, Florida — George Starling's home — only began integrating in the late 1960s. A fight at the newly integrated high school produced a complicated test case: the Black assistant principal (demoted from principal of the colored school) ruled in favor of the white student, against the wishes of the Black parents. We're crying out against prejudice and mistreatment, George said. If you want it eliminated, you have to do unto others as you want them to do unto you. When the next fight came, Willis V. McCall — the sheriff who had shot two handcuffed prisoners in the 1949 Groveland case — rode up with his police dog. A church load of Black parents drove to the county seat at Tavares and demanded the school board stop letting McCall raise their children. They did not back down. McCall took down his colored only waiting room sign in September 1971, possibly the last elected official in the country to do so, and only under threat of a federal court order. He lost his next election. Black voters, newly able to vote in force, turned out and sent him home with cars and taxicabs. McCall retired to his Lake County ranch, where he kept the colored only sign on display in his living room until his death. The defeat of the old order had a vote count behind it — and the votes came from the people who had stayed, working in tandem with the people who had left.

Monroe and the surname that lost the new school

The Foster section of the topic is one of the book's saddest small portraits. Professor Foster — Robert's father, who had run Monroe Colored High for decades, who had taught most every Black professional in the parish — had been edged out of his principalship in the 1950s. When the new colored high school finally went up, it was named not for him but for the Carrolls, a family that had stayed. The Migration had drained away many of the people who remembered them, Wilkerson writes. The Foster name landed instead on a public housing project — Foster Heights Homes, Swayze Street, "an assemblage of low-rise apartments of pink brick and struggling lawn" — so that every shooting or drug bust that made the evening news resurrected the Foster name in exactly the way Professor Foster's life had been built to repudiate. Migration thinned the loyalists. Staying produced civic legacy. The cost of leaving was paid not only in the city you arrived in but in the city you left.

Robert walks into a desegregated diner and finds it ordinary

Returning to Monroe to bury his father and his brother and his sister-in-law, Robert decided to walk into a diner that had once been white-only. He sat down, ordered, ate, nobody commented. The topic's quietest line follows: It was nothing special and, in fact, underwhelming after all those years of being denied entrance and dreaming of being inside. The desegregation of a single diner — a thing for which generations had been beaten and killed — felt, in the moment of its arrival, almost banal. The South was changing; the dream the migrants had carried was rendered, by the change, both real and small.

Key takeaways

Mental model

Copy sourceZoom

Practical application

How to read a place after the people who would have changed it leave.

A reader's practice:

1. Read the sending region, not just the receiving region. Most migration histories stop at the destination. Wilkerson's topic is a corrective. The places the migrants left kept living — and the migration changed them, often in ways the migrants themselves never witnessed.
2. Watch for replacement technology. When a labor force exits, capital almost always fills the gap. Mechanical harvesters replaced sharecroppers in Mississippi; today, automation replaces remittance-earning emigrants in the regions they left.
3. Track who stays and who returns. The Carrolls, who stayed in Monroe, ended up with the new high school's name. The migrants paid civic invisibility in the place they left as part of the price of leaving.
4. Expect anticlimax at the moment of arrival. Robert's diner. The integration the South's Black population had fought, marched, and died for showed up as an ordinary meal at an ordinary table. The dream's arrival rarely matches the dream's magnitude.

Example

A contemporary parallel: the post-1990 Eastern European emigration to the United Kingdom, Germany, and Ireland — Polish, Romanian, Bulgarian workers leaving for jobs across the EU. The places they left went through the topic's same arc in compressed time. Bulgarian villages emptied of working-age adults; remittance flows became a meaningful share of GDP; agriculture mechanized or shrank; the political opening that followed — long-delayed local elections finally turning to candidates who promised reform rather than patronage — happened in part because the emigrants kept sending pressure home (money, expectations, occasional return visits with German license plates). The sending region was transformed by the absence the migration created, in the same shape Wilkerson maps for the South: labor force collapse, economic restructuring, delayed political opening, generational anticlimax when the long-promised change actually arrives. The grammar of out-migration's long-run effect on the sending region is older than any one century.

Related lessons