The Majesty of the Law (Part 3 of 3)

Core idea

The third part closes the Taylor Estate arc. The New York Court of Appeals ruled for Moses in 1925; the Times ran a celebratory editorial; the precedent expanded eminent domain for park use across mid-century American jurisprudence. Within ten years, federal courts would cite the New York rulings to permit slum clearance, urban renewal, and ultimately the Interstate Highway System. Moses's first land grab on Long Island was not just a victory; it was a doctrinal precedent.

Why it matters

The decision and its language

The Court of Appeals upheld the appropriation, ruling that the legislature had broad discretion to define public purpose and that the commission's survey-power was a permissible exercise of that discretion. The decision used language so capacious it would later be cited for almost any government taking. Caro emphasizes the casualness with which the court expanded state power to seize private land.

The Times canonizes Moses

The New York Times — which had run the class-story line throughout the fight — now editorialized that Moses was a public servant of rare ability and integrity. The relationship between Moses and the Times would last forty years and protect him from criticism well past the point at which criticism became overdue.

Key takeaways

Mental model

Copy sourceZoom

Practical application

Example

The 1819 Supreme Court ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, establishing implied federal powers, is the single ruling most often cited to justify mid-twentieth-century federal regulatory expansion. One ruling, two centuries of consequence. The 1925 Court of Appeals ruling is the same pattern at state scale.

Related lessons