The Taste of Power

Core idea

The Taste of Power is the shortest topic of the book's first third and the most psychologically pointed. Standing in the New York Senate chamber in early 1924, watching senators debate the park bond bill he had drafted, Moses experienced for the first time the sensation of having authored the document the most powerful men in the state were arguing about. Caro is explicit: Moses was intoxicated. The topic is the moment the reformer's idealism becomes the operator's appetite. From this day forward Moses wanted power — not only for the dreams it would build, but increasingly for itself.

Why it matters

The Senate Chamber as theatre

Caro describes the chamber — fifty-foot ceiling, Siena marble, oak desks, stained-glass windows — in the loving detail of a man who knows the room is the seducer. Moses, watching the bill he had written become law in real time, was watching the most powerful men in New York argue about routes he had drawn at midnight in a borrowed office.

Idealism becomes appetite

Throughout Line of Succession (Part 1 of 2) through Change in Major (Part 3 of 3) Caro has been careful to insist Moses worked on civil service and parks because he believed in them. The Senate-gallery moment is the inflection. Moses now wanted to draft more bills, control more bureaucracy — not only because parks were worth it but because the experience of being the author of the room's debate was worth it. The dreams were still there; the appetite joined them as an independent motive.

Key takeaways

Mental model

Copy sourceZoom

Practical application

Example

Many tech founders show the trajectory: the first product is built because the founder wants to solve a problem. After the product succeeds, a second motive layers in — the experience of running the organization, being deferred to, appearing on covers. By the second decade the second motive often dominates. Moses's path through 1924 is the same path.

Related lessons